• Benchmark
• Results
• Comparison

JPA Performance Benchmark (JPAB)

Comparison of EclipseLink with SQLite embedded vs EclipseLink with H2 server

Each of the following tables focuses on a specific database operation, where the last table presents average results comparison.

Speed comparison of JPA database persistence operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server
Basic Person Test	0.074	5.6	0.90	2.5	0.49	4.0
Element Collection Test	0.061	4.2	0.65	1.5	0.36	2.8
Inheritance Test	0.083	6.6	0.82	2.1	0.45	4.4
Indexing Test	0.11	9.7	1.6	4.1	0.87	6.9
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	0.24	4.7	0.91	3.5	0.57	4.1
Multithreading Test	0.10	10.2	2.1	4.0	1.1	7.1
All Tests	0.11	6.8	1.2	2.9	0.64	4.9

The results above show that in general EclipseLink with H2 server is much more efficient than EclipseLink with SQLite embedded in persisting JPA entity objects to the database. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with SQLite embedded database (0.64) to the normalized speed of EclipseLink with H2 database server (4.9) reveals that in these tests, EclipseLink with H2 server is 7.7 times faster than EclipseLink with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using multithreading with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with SQLite embedded database (0.10) to the normalized speed of EclipseLink with H2 database server (10.2) reveals that in that case, EclipseLink with H2 server is 102 times faster than EclipseLink with SQLite embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database retrieval operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server
Basic Person Test	failed	5.5	failed	8.2	failed	6.8
Element Collection Test	0.0007	3.2	failed	4.2	0.0007	3.7
Inheritance Test	failed	4.7	failed	10.1	failed	7.4
Indexing Test	failed	4.4	failed	9.4	failed	6.9
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	failed	1.1	failed	1.9	failed	1.5
Multithreading Test	failed	12.2	failed	15.9	failed	14.0
All Tests	0.0007	5.2	failed	8.3	0.0007	6.7

EclipseLink with SQLite embedded has failed in 11 tests (see exceptions).

Speed comparison of JPA database query operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server
Basic Person Test	1.2	3.8	failed	1.1	1.2	2.5
Element Collection Test	0.29	4.1	failed	1.1	0.29	2.6
Inheritance Test	0.69	3.2	failed	1.3	0.69	2.3
Indexing Test	0.0008	3.0	failed	8.0	0.0008	5.5
Multithreading Test	failed	1.1	failed	1.0	failed	1.1
All Tests	0.55	3.0	failed	2.5	0.55	2.8

EclipseLink with SQLite embedded has failed in 6 tests (see exceptions).

Speed comparison of JPA database update operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server
Basic Person Test	failed	4.5	failed	2.2	failed	3.4
Element Collection Test	0.0016	3.8	failed	2.4	0.0016	3.1
Inheritance Test	failed	4.4	failed	3.0	failed	3.7
Indexing Test	failed	4.2	failed	3.1	failed	3.7
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	failed	1.4	failed	0.79	failed	1.1
Multithreading Test	failed	7.8	failed	2.5	failed	5.1
All Tests	0.0016	4.3	failed	2.3	0.0016	3.3

EclipseLink with SQLite embedded has failed in 11 tests (see exceptions).

Speed comparison of JPA database removal operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server
Basic Person Test	failed	6.4	failed	3.1	failed	4.8
Element Collection Test	0.0006	3.0	failed	1.3	0.0006	2.2
Inheritance Test	failed	5.6	failed	2.8	failed	4.2
Indexing Test	failed	10.3	failed	3.8	failed	7.0
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	failed	1.5	failed	1.3	failed	1.4
Multithreading Test	failed	7.0	failed	4.9	failed	6.0
All Tests	0.0006	5.6	failed	2.9	0.0006	4.3

EclipseLink with SQLite embedded has failed in 11 tests (see exceptions).

Comparison of JPA/Database speed - the averages (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction/Retrieval Size	Few Entities		Many Entities		Average Score
	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server	EclipseLink SQLite embedded	EclipseLink H2 server
Basic Person Test	0.66	5.2	0.90	3.4	0.74	4.3
Element Collection Test	0.070	3.6	0.65	2.1	0.17	2.9
Inheritance Test	0.38	4.9	0.82	3.9	0.53	4.4
Indexing Test	0.058	6.3	1.6	5.7	0.58	6.0
Graph (Binary Tree) Test	0.24	2.1	0.91	1.9	0.57	2.0
Multithreading Test	0.10	7.7	2.1	5.7	1.1	6.7
All Tests	0.22	5.1	1.2	3.8	0.52	4.5

The results above show that in general EclipseLink with H2 server is much more efficient than EclipseLink with SQLite embedded in performing JPA database operations. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with SQLite embedded database (0.52) to the normalized speed of EclipseLink with H2 database server (4.5) reveals that in these tests, EclipseLink with H2 server is 8.7 times faster than EclipseLink with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using database indexes with small transaction/retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of EclipseLink with SQLite embedded database (0.058) to the normalized speed of EclipseLink with H2 database server (6.3) reveals that in that case, EclipseLink with H2 server is 109 times faster than EclipseLink with SQLite embedded.

Other Head to Head DBMS/JPA Comparisons

JPA Performance Benchmark - Copyright © 2010, 2011, 2012 ObjectDB Software Ltd. - All rights reserved.
The benchmark program is released as open source under the GPL license.