Compare with

Comparison of EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded vs DataNucleus with SQLite embedded

Each of the following tables focuses on a specific database operation, where the last table presents average results comparison.

Speed comparison of JPA database persistence operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>Few EntitiesMany EntitiesAverage Score
 EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test14.5 14.1 14.3 
Element Collection Test13.2 10.2 11.7 
Inheritance Test9.9 15.0 12.4 
Indexing Test15.3 15.6 15.4 
Graph (Binary Tree) Test8.0 8.1 8.0 
Multithreading Test11.8 0.0000 5.9 
All Tests12.1 10.5 11.3 

Speed comparison of JPA database retrieval operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>Few EntitiesMany EntitiesAverage Score
 EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test36.10.4334.4 35.30.43
Element Collection Test17.9 31.9 24.9 
Inheritance Test14.0 38.8 26.4 
Indexing Test21.9 52.5 37.2 
Graph (Binary Tree) Test5.7 8.4 7.0 
Multithreading Test26.3 28.0 27.2 
All Tests20.30.4332.4 26.30.43

The results above show that in general EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded is much more efficient than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded in retrieving JPA entity objects from the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.43) to the normalized speed of EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded database (26.3) reveals that in these tests, EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded is 61.2 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.43) to the normalized speed of EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded database (36.1) reveals that in that case, EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded is 84.0 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database query operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>Few EntitiesMany EntitiesAverage Score
 EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test0.68failed3.4 2.0failed
Element Collection Test1.5 5.5 3.5 
Inheritance Test0.58 4.1 2.3 
Indexing Test22.8 34.0 28.4 
Multithreading Test0.47 1.3 0.88 
All Tests5.2failed9.7 7.4failed

DataNucleus with SQLite embedded has failed in 1 tests (see exceptions).

Speed comparison of JPA database update operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>Few EntitiesMany EntitiesAverage Score
 EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test13.20.02510.4 11.80.025
Element Collection Test24.3 10.5 17.4 
Inheritance Test15.3 13.3 14.3 
Indexing Test41.0 12.3 26.7 
Graph (Binary Tree) Test7.7 4.6 6.1 
Multithreading Test7.2 5.9 6.6 
All Tests18.10.0259.5 13.80.025

The results above show that in general EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded is much more efficient than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded in updating JPA entity objects in the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.025) to the normalized speed of EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded database (13.8) reveals that in these tests, EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded is 552 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.025) to the normalized speed of EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded database (13.2) reveals that in that case, EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded is 528 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database removal operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>Few EntitiesMany EntitiesAverage Score
 EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test59.90.1737.5 48.70.17
Element Collection Test22.7 3.4 13.0 
Inheritance Test59.4 22.6 41.0 
Indexing Test93.6 18.8 56.2 
Graph (Binary Tree) Test18.5 26.2 22.4 
Multithreading Test17.9 100 58.9 
All Tests45.30.1734.7 40.00.17

The results above show that in general EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded is much more efficient than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded in deleting JPA entity objects from the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.17) to the normalized speed of EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded database (40.0) reveals that in these tests, EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded is 235 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.17) to the normalized speed of EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded database (59.9) reveals that in that case, EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded is 352 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

Comparison of database storage efficiency (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>Few EntitiesMany EntitiesAverage Score
 EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test98.1 98.1 98.1 
Element Collection Test49.4 49.4 49.4 
Inheritance Test100 98.4 99.2 
Indexing Test98.3 98.3 98.3 
Graph (Binary Tree) Test95.3 95.3 95.3 
Multithreading Test98.1 98.1 98.1 
All Tests89.9 89.6 89.7 

Comparison of JPA/Database speed - the averages (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction/Retrieval SizeFew EntitiesMany EntitiesAverage Score
 EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
EclipseLink
HSQLDB embedded
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test24.90.2120.0 22.40.21
Element Collection Test15.9 12.3 14.1 
Inheritance Test19.8 18.8 19.3 
Indexing Test38.9 26.7 32.8 
Graph (Binary Tree) Test10.0 11.8 10.9 
Multithreading Test12.7 27.0 19.9 
All Tests20.70.2119.7 20.20.21

The results above show that in general EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded is much more efficient than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded in performing JPA database operations. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.21) to the normalized speed of EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded database (20.2) reveals that in these tests, EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded is 96.2 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small transaction/retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.21) to the normalized speed of EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded database (24.9) reveals that in that case, EclipseLink with HSQLDB embedded is 119 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

Other Head to Head DBMS/JPA Comparisons