Compare with

Comparison of OpenJPA with H2 server vs DataNucleus with SQLite embedded

Each of the following tables focuses on a specific database operation, where the last table presents average results comparison.

Speed comparison of JPA database persistence operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>Few EntitiesMany EntitiesAverage Score
 OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test8.1 6.6 7.3 
Element Collection Test6.4 6.9 6.7 
Inheritance Test4.4 7.4 5.9 
Indexing Test7.2 9.4 8.3 
Graph (Binary Tree) Test2.5 2.1 2.3 
Multithreading Test7.8 0.0000 3.9 
All Tests6.1 5.4 5.7 

Speed comparison of JPA database retrieval operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>Few EntitiesMany EntitiesAverage Score
 OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test1.70.436.1 3.90.43
Element Collection Test0.32 6.9 3.6 
Inheritance Test0.82 4.8 2.8 
Indexing Test1.1 9.7 5.4 
Graph (Binary Tree) Test0.11 0.15 0.13 
Multithreading Test2.2 9.6 5.9 
All Tests1.10.436.2 3.60.43

The results above show that in general OpenJPA with H2 server is much more efficient than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded in retrieving JPA entity objects from the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.43) to the normalized speed of OpenJPA with H2 database server (3.6) reveals that in these tests, OpenJPA with H2 server is 8.4 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

A large performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.43) to the normalized speed of OpenJPA with H2 database server (1.7) reveals that in that case, OpenJPA with H2 server is 4.0 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database query operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Retrieval Size =>Few EntitiesMany EntitiesAverage Score
 OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test0.54failed2.2 1.4failed
Element Collection Test0.53 2.0 1.3 
Inheritance Test0.42 2.1 1.2 
Indexing Test0.78 2.6 1.7 
Multithreading Test2.9 4.3 3.6 
All Tests1.0failed2.6 1.8failed

DataNucleus with SQLite embedded has failed in 1 tests (see exceptions).

Speed comparison of JPA database update operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>Few EntitiesMany EntitiesAverage Score
 OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test1.10.0252.1 1.60.025
Element Collection Test1.2 3.6 2.4 
Inheritance Test1.2 2.5 1.8 
Indexing Test3.3 2.9 3.1 
Graph (Binary Tree) Test0.61 0.34 0.48 
Multithreading Test2.7 0.76 1.8 
All Tests1.70.0252.0 1.90.025

The results above show that in general OpenJPA with H2 server is much more efficient than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded in updating JPA entity objects in the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.025) to the normalized speed of OpenJPA with H2 database server (1.9) reveals that in these tests, OpenJPA with H2 server is 76.0 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.025) to the normalized speed of OpenJPA with H2 database server (1.1) reveals that in that case, OpenJPA with H2 server is 44.0 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

Speed comparison of JPA database removal operations (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction Size =>Few EntitiesMany EntitiesAverage Score
 OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test6.90.1711.6 9.30.17
Element Collection Test3.5 2.2 2.9 
Inheritance Test8.0 5.4 6.7 
Indexing Test12.2 5.8 9.0 
Graph (Binary Tree) Test7.4 10.0 8.7 
Multithreading Test8.3 0.0000 4.1 
All Tests7.70.175.8 6.80.17

The results above show that in general OpenJPA with H2 server is much more efficient than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded in deleting JPA entity objects from the database. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.17) to the normalized speed of OpenJPA with H2 database server (6.8) reveals that in these tests, OpenJPA with H2 server is 40.0 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small transaction size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.17) to the normalized speed of OpenJPA with H2 database server (6.9) reveals that in that case, OpenJPA with H2 server is 40.6 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

Comparison of JPA/Database speed - the averages (normalized score, higher is better)

Transaction/Retrieval SizeFew EntitiesMany EntitiesAverage Score
 OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
OpenJPA
H2 server
DataNucleus
SQLite embedded
Basic Person Test3.70.215.7 4.70.21
Element Collection Test2.4 4.3 3.4 
Inheritance Test3.0 4.4 3.7 
Indexing Test4.9 6.1 5.5 
Graph (Binary Tree) Test2.7 3.2 2.9 
Multithreading Test4.8 2.9 3.9 
All Tests3.60.214.5 4.00.21

The results above show that in general OpenJPA with H2 server is much more efficient than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded in performing JPA database operations. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.21) to the normalized speed of OpenJPA with H2 database server (4.0) reveals that in these tests, OpenJPA with H2 server is 19.0 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

A huge performance gap has been detected when using simple basic entities with small transaction/retrieval size. Comparing the normalized speed of DataNucleus with SQLite embedded database (0.21) to the normalized speed of OpenJPA with H2 database server (3.7) reveals that in that case, OpenJPA with H2 server is 17.6 times faster than DataNucleus with SQLite embedded.

Other Head to Head DBMS/JPA Comparisons